British American Tobacco Kenya (BAT Kenya), a subsidiary of the global tobacco giant British American Tobacco (BAT), has found itself at the center of controversy following a new study that suggests the company may have evaded up to Ksh 9.6 billion (approximately $93 million) in taxes. The research, conducted by the Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG) at the University of Bath in collaboration with Tax Justice Network Africa, highlights significant discrepancies in the company’s reported revenues for 2017 and 2018.
The findings, based on a comprehensive review of BAT Kenya’s financial reports, production data submitted to the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA), government documents, and cigarette consumption statistics, raise serious concerns over the company’s tax compliance and financial transparency.
The Findings of the Study
According to the researchers, an analysis of BAT Kenya’s financial reports from 2013 to 2019 showed discrepancies in the number of cigarette packs produced versus those reported for tax purposes. The study identified millions of unaccounted-for cigarette packs, potentially leading to billions in lost tax revenue for Kenya.
Dr. Leopoldo Parada, Reader in Tax Law at King’s College London, commented on the report, stating, “In the absence of a convincing explanation, this looks like tax avoidance and potentially even tax evasion. A closer review by tax authorities is necessary to determine the full extent of any wrongdoing.”
Kennedy Waituika, Director of Audit and Assurance at TradeMark Africa, also weighed in, urging the Kenya Revenue Authority to take swift action. “This report should trigger an immediate tax review of BAT Kenya. The government must ensure multinational corporations are held accountable for their tax obligations,” he said.
BAT Kenya’s Response
In response to the allegations, BAT Kenya has strongly denied any wrongdoing, insisting that it adheres to all legal tax requirements. The company released a statement rejecting the claims, saying, “BAT Kenya firmly rejects all the allegations regarding the discrepancy between its published financial disclosures and tax data. We remain committed to transparency and compliance with all applicable laws.”
While BAT Kenya maintains its innocence, the study has reignited discussions on corporate tax avoidance, particularly among multinational companies operating in Africa. Kenya, like many developing economies, relies heavily on tax revenues to fund public services, and any loss of potential revenue could have significant economic consequences.
A History of Controversy: BAT’s Troubled Past
This is not the first time BAT Kenya—or its parent company BAT—has faced allegations of unethical business practices. Over the years, the company has been embroiled in multiple scandals worldwide, including cases of bribery, fraud, and corporate espionage.
Bribery Scandal in Kenya and East Africa
In 2015, a BBC investigation exposed BAT’s involvement in a bribery scandal in East Africa. The company was found to have paid bribes to public officials and politicians in Kenya, Uganda, and Burundi to influence government regulations in its favor. According to whistleblower Paul Hopkins, a former BAT employee, the company systematically engaged in corruption to undermine anti-smoking laws.
The BBC’s “Panorama” program revealed that BAT had paid off officials to gain access to confidential information about tobacco control policies being drafted by the Kenyan government. These underhanded tactics were aimed at weakening legislation that could hurt BAT’s profits. Following these revelations, BAT faced widespread condemnation, but the company largely escaped significant penalties.
Corporate Espionage Allegations
BAT has also been accused of engaging in corporate espionage against competitors and regulatory agencies. Reports have suggested that the company planted informants within rival tobacco firms and even within government agencies to obtain sensitive information. These claims have further damaged BAT’s reputation, reinforcing perceptions of the company as a corporation that prioritizes profits over ethical business conduct.
Legal Troubles in the United States and Europe
Outside of Africa, BAT has been involved in major legal battles over tax evasion and unethical marketing practices. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice fined BAT $635 million after the company admitted to violating sanctions by conducting business with North Korea. The company was accused of using a network of intermediaries to continue selling tobacco products to North Korea, despite international sanctions prohibiting such transactions.
In Europe, BAT has faced multiple lawsuits over misleading marketing strategies that targeted young consumers. The company has also been scrutinized for its role in the illicit tobacco trade, with allegations that it has facilitated smuggling operations in certain markets to avoid taxes and maximize profits.
The Implications for Kenya
The latest allegations against BAT Kenya have sparked concerns over corporate accountability and government oversight. If the tax discrepancies are confirmed, it would indicate a major failure in regulatory enforcement. The Kenya Revenue Authority, already struggling with revenue collection challenges, faces mounting pressure to investigate and take action against the tobacco giant.
Kenyan legislators and civil society organizations have called for greater scrutiny of multinational corporations operating in the country. Speaking on the matter, activist Marcel Metze from The Investigative Desk said, “Our investigations into big transnational tobacco corporations have repeatedly uncovered a lack of transparency and aggressive tax planning practices. The Kenyan government must ensure that BAT is not allowed to evade its tax responsibilities.”
Moreover, given BAT’s history of financial misconduct and corruption, experts argue that Kenya must reassess its regulatory framework to prevent similar tax-related controversies in the future. The potential loss of Ksh 9.6 billion in tax revenue could have been allocated to critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure development.
Calls for Further Investigation
As the controversy unfolds, calls for a formal investigation into BAT Kenya’s tax practices have intensified. Lawmakers and tax experts have urged the KRA to conduct a forensic audit of the company’s financial records to determine whether the reported tax discrepancies constitute deliberate fraud.
Bob Blackman, Co-Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Vaping (APPG) on Smoking and Health, has called for an international review of BAT’s financial operations. “Given the new evidence emerging from Kenya, it may be necessary for the Serious Fraud Office to re-open its investigation into BAT. The company’s business practices must be scrutinized at a global level.”
Meanwhile, Dr. Rob Branston from TCRG emphasized the broader implications of BAT’s financial irregularities. “This case highlights a troubling pattern of corporate behavior that requires urgent intervention. Multinational corporations, especially those operating in developing countries, must be held accountable for their tax obligations.”
The allegations against BAT Kenya mark yet another chapter in the company’s long history of controversy. While the company denies any wrongdoing, the evidence presented in the study raises important questions about financial transparency and corporate ethics. As regulatory bodies and tax authorities examine the claims, the outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how multinational corporations are held accountable for their tax responsibilities in Kenya and beyond.
For now, the Kenyan public awaits a response from the government and the Kenya Revenue Authority on whether they will launch a full-scale investigation into BAT Kenya’s financial dealings. If the allegations are substantiated, it could lead to substantial penalties and reforms aimed at preventing future tax evasion by multinational firms operating in the country.
Leave a Reply