High Costs In An Election Petition Are An Impediment To The Right of Access To Justice

Date:

HIGH COSTS (IN ELECTION PETITIONS) ARE AN IMPEDIMENT TO THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE

“In our understanding, the capping of costs provided under Rule 30 of the Petition Rules 2017 was to ensure that parties approach courts without fear of being subjected to excessive costs. Despite this rule, the current trend in the capping of costs at inordinately high amounts shows that we are going back to the era where costs in election petitions were very high. Capping of costs was intended to curb the practice of awarding large sums in costs. High costs are an impediment to the right of access to justice and are not meant to be punitive.”

Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Warsame, Musinga & Ouko, JJA) in Election Petition Appeal No. 1 of 2017 (Nyeri) between Hon. Martha Wangari KARUA and IEBC & 3 Others (being an appeal from the whole of the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Kerugoya (L.W. Gitari, J.) dated 15th November 2017 in Election Petition No. 2 of 2017.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

James Orengo: Decades in Power, Zero Tangible Development — The Record Speaks

 James Orengo: Decades in Power, Zero Tangible Development —...

FAILED PROTESTS LAY BARE OPPOSITION’S STRUGGLE TO CONNECT WITH KENYANS

Yesterday’s demonstrations were meant to be a defining political...

EXPOSE: THE “UNTOUCHABLE” CLERK AT KWALE ASSEMBLY AND THE BILLIONS UNDER SHADOW

Serious questions are now emerging around the operations of...

KENYA’S ECONOMIC RECOVERY UNDER THREAT AS GLOBAL SHOCKS AND FLOODS PILE PRESSURE

Kenya’s fragile economic recovery is facing fresh strain as...