Uhuru Lawyer Fred Ngatia Shoots Self In The Foot, Falls Into NASA Trap.

Date:

From the courts

Fred Ngatia blindly quotes the 2013 SC ruling;

Maraga: Elaborate your understanding of that
opinion counsel?

Ngatia: My Lords, indeed fresh nomination ought to have ensued had it not been for Ekuru Aukot ruling a day after the withdrawal of Raila Odinga.

Maraga: But that ruling came a day after. What if Ekuro Aukot’s ruling was not there?

Ngatia: Then that means fresh Election with nomination would have taken place cancelling the immediate election as gazetted by IEBC my Lord.

Philomena Mwilu: If it is so, then on 5th September IEBC gazetted only two candidates without nomination , was this irregular?

Ngatia: heheheheheh my lady ok ok I can explain , Raila Odinga was within the law when he withdrew because that came before the ruling of Ekuru Aukot.

Lenaola: Counsel, do you therefore mean applying the ruling to the abandoned election as IEBC did was retrogressive?

Ngatia: hehehe …mmmh My Lords, Thats not what am saying..

24 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

MUTUSE IN TROUBLE: UDA MP ACCUSED OF DIVIDING PARTY, FACING RECALL THREATS

Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse is facing mounting political...

Best Betting Sites in Kenya for 2026

Looking for the best betting sites in Kenya for...

Co-operative Bank Commits KES 967.5 Million to Nandi Hydropower Project

Chief of Staff and Head of Public Service Felix...

ODM Party at cross-roads: The Defining moment post-Raila Odinga

For over two decades, the Orange Democrratic Party (ODM)...