High Costs In An Election Petition Are An Impediment To The Right of Access To Justice

Date:

HIGH COSTS (IN ELECTION PETITIONS) ARE AN IMPEDIMENT TO THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE

“In our understanding, the capping of costs provided under Rule 30 of the Petition Rules 2017 was to ensure that parties approach courts without fear of being subjected to excessive costs. Despite this rule, the current trend in the capping of costs at inordinately high amounts shows that we are going back to the era where costs in election petitions were very high. Capping of costs was intended to curb the practice of awarding large sums in costs. High costs are an impediment to the right of access to justice and are not meant to be punitive.”

Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Warsame, Musinga & Ouko, JJA) in Election Petition Appeal No. 1 of 2017 (Nyeri) between Hon. Martha Wangari KARUA and IEBC & 3 Others (being an appeal from the whole of the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Kerugoya (L.W. Gitari, J.) dated 15th November 2017 in Election Petition No. 2 of 2017.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

DR BEN CHUMO ACCUSED OF CHILD ABDUCTION AND INTIMIDATION AS FATHER KEV ODUOR DEMANDS ANSWERS

A bitter custody battle has exploded into the public...

DPP Version: Obado Orchestrated Calculated Plot to Murder Sharon Otieno, Court Urged to Convict

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions has...

Kisumu Public Trustee Office on the Spot Over Alleged Embezzlement of Orphans’ Trust Fund

Serious questions are emerging over the management of trust...