Judiciary vs Statehouse: Court declines president Uhuru’s orders

Date:

The High Court has on Thursday ,Feb 6 ruled that President Uhuru Kenyatta’s decision declining to appoint 41 judges picked by the Judicial Service Commission as unconstitutional.

In a petition, the Law Society of Kenya sought to have President Kenyatta compelled to appoint the 41 jurists.

The three-judge bench composed of Justices James Makau, Lydia Achode and Chacha Mwita ruled that the President had no power to review, reconsider or decline to the appointment of judges as forwarded by the Judicial Service Commission.

The Judges also ruled that the JSC also had no power to review the names again once they have been forwarded to the President.

The High Court judges also faulted the National Intelligence Service for failing to disclose the adverse information they alleged against some of the judges during the interview process

“The appointment of judges by the President should be immediate and should not delay or take time. The Constitution demands that the President appoints the judges within 14 days after the names are forwarded to him,” ruled the three-judge bench.

145 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

DR BEN CHUMO ACCUSED OF CHILD ABDUCTION AND INTIMIDATION AS FATHER KEV ODUOR DEMANDS ANSWERS

A bitter custody battle has exploded into the public...

DPP Version: Obado Orchestrated Calculated Plot to Murder Sharon Otieno, Court Urged to Convict

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions has...

Kisumu Public Trustee Office on the Spot Over Alleged Embezzlement of Orphans’ Trust Fund

Serious questions are emerging over the management of trust...