Uhuru Lawyer Fred Ngatia Shoots Self In The Foot, Falls Into NASA Trap.

Date:

From the courts

Fred Ngatia blindly quotes the 2013 SC ruling;

Maraga: Elaborate your understanding of that
opinion counsel?

Ngatia: My Lords, indeed fresh nomination ought to have ensued had it not been for Ekuru Aukot ruling a day after the withdrawal of Raila Odinga.

Maraga: But that ruling came a day after. What if Ekuro Aukot’s ruling was not there?

Ngatia: Then that means fresh Election with nomination would have taken place cancelling the immediate election as gazetted by IEBC my Lord.

Philomena Mwilu: If it is so, then on 5th September IEBC gazetted only two candidates without nomination , was this irregular?

Ngatia: heheheheheh my lady ok ok I can explain , Raila Odinga was within the law when he withdrew because that came before the ruling of Ekuru Aukot.

Lenaola: Counsel, do you therefore mean applying the ruling to the abandoned election as IEBC did was retrogressive?

Ngatia: hehehe …mmmh My Lords, Thats not what am saying..

24 COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

DR BEN CHUMO ACCUSED OF CHILD ABDUCTION AND INTIMIDATION AS FATHER KEV ODUOR DEMANDS ANSWERS

A bitter custody battle has exploded into the public...

DPP Version: Obado Orchestrated Calculated Plot to Murder Sharon Otieno, Court Urged to Convict

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions has...

Kisumu Public Trustee Office on the Spot Over Alleged Embezzlement of Orphans’ Trust Fund

Serious questions are emerging over the management of trust...